Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Archer17
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by outlaw
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
Outlaw...you didn't answer my question...how do we investigate it now??
|
It was investigated when the even as happening and there was no radar malfunctions.It was classified because of that investigation...and later declassified to be part of another investigation which have find no natural explanations.What do you need more?What a new (now)investigation of the same event will add?
The Officially Cleared Report - Maj. Donald Keyhoe
http://www.nicap.dabsol.co.uk/gulfc.htm |
The problem I have with all "investigations" are they are after the fact and thus speculative. Some, like COMETA and similar U.S. ventures, come to contradictory conclusions. |
Contradictory conclusions depend upon how the study is made and
the selection of cases presented.If like the Condon report you chose not talking about the most complicated reports of observations you can conclude the report about the UFO problem saying its swamp gas or planet Venus or meteors.Contrary to what I have stated previously the Gulf of Mexico Case
December 6, 1952 was not even mentioned in the Condon Blue book report but is studied in the Cometa report.
Critics upon Blue Book
ON LACK OF ATTENTION TO SIGNIFICANT CASES
Appendix 4, Section E, Paragraph 1
First part
http://www.cohenufo.org/ocr.4b.html
http://www.cohenufo.org/ocr.5a.html