View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 07:06 AM
MrObvious MrObvious is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stu
I also wish to lend my voice in saying that, in my interpretation of the BA's rules (though since it's not my board, my interpretation doesn't really matter), JPax should've been banned long, long ago, and if anything, SciFi Chick should've gotten a medal.

Personally, I got into an arguement with JPax before on this board and even though I tried to remain relatively civil, I got really ticked off at him. Among others, SciFi Chick came to my defense and she was also among those who had told me that JPax likes to start these sorts of arguments and then tries to confuse the issue with colorful and flowery language that is dripping with sarcasm. If I hadn't been in the right frame of mind, I would've posted how I felt and gotten myself banned.

I think SciFi Chick just had been up against this so many times, she was probably having a bad day, and JPax just tipped her over the edge.

In my opinion, the banning criteria should be allowed to be offset by a person's track record, in which case SciFi Chick should be welcomed back on this board with open arms.

Well said Stu, I'd go further to say she showed remarkable restraint considering all the history.
Point in case, it would never have happened if it was acted upon earlier so I quess we can all learn something here. If there is someone doing such things then report them straight away, it's too late once people are pushed beyond their limits. Secondly, it's impossible for the BA to keep this place fair without our input.....
__________________
MrObvious
Reply With Quote