Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry
So my question is, was the time of landing indicated by detection of a Doppler shift, or a special pulsing of the transmitter? Does the Doppler signal indicate an acceleration that increased the velocity to a fairly high speed after the release of the 2.9 meter parachute or is the velocity surprisingly uniform?
|
Jerry, you have a kind of selective blindness to what others are trying to explaine you: Tassel has already give the anwers on the previous page!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tassel
John M Sarkissian, Operations Scientist wrote:
At 9:32 pm Doug reported seeing the glitch in the Doppler shift that indicated the main parachute had deployed on schedule.
Jim Border, decided to plot the sky frequency, that is, the actual frequency received. Sure enough, there was a large glitch at the suspected landing time of 11:45 pm.
|
I'll post again his source:
http://www.atnf.csiro.au/news/newsle...ng_Huygens.htm
Already you proved that you don't want to search the data you claim you need (by the wat, now you have Huygens landing coordinates, it is up to you to prove that it has reached the ground faster) but you also don't want to see those data when they are bringed in front of your eyes! Not nice at all...