(Kaysing) The Dutch papers on July 21 [1969] said that the moon landing was a hoax, was a fake, and I have been unable to find any of those Dutch papers

Then how does he know they exist? If he has seen them, why didn't he ask for copies, or jot down the name of the paper? That would give us something to go on.

If he hasn't seen them, then how is this evidence any more than hearsay, rumor, and conjecture?

...although it's well documented that they did publish information, with proof

Then where is the documentation? Bill Kaysing can produce absolutely nothing to substantiate this claim. He makes a claim that can be substantiated, that ought to be substantiated -- but he refuses to substantiate it. That's pure crackpottery.

You can't make an entire edition of a newspaper disappear. Copies of newspapers from July 20 and 21, 1969 are collector's items. They're mementos. Bill Kaysing wants us to believe that not one Dutch schoolboy's scrapbook or one Dutch town library back room contains a copy of even one of these newspapers!

This is what irritates me about conspiracy theorists. When you ask for evidence for their outlandish claims, all you get are outlandish excuses for why they can't produce that evidence.