Also, he mentioned the Earth shots were taken from an unmanned probe. What? He says in the video that the astronauts were in low Earth orbit, so he's contradicting himself there. He also said in the interview the astronauts were fiddling with the transparency. Again, which is it? Unmanned, or manned in LEO?

Not to rain on your parade here (it was cool) but I believe what Sibrel was saying was that the transparency was made from an image previously taken by an unmanned probe, rather than the image being sent 'live' by the probe. The crew then put this manufactured image over the window. This is David Percy's argument. Didn't Sibrel believe they just put a circular cutout over the window and filmed the Earth through this cutout? Or was that some other nutter? Either way, he's found bits of evidence that can be spun to fit his hypothysis, whilst he ignores the gazillion other bits of evidence which rubbish it.

BTW, welcome to the 'Sibrel knows he's lying' club.