View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2005, 01:41 PM
lyndonashmore lyndonashmore is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gulf
Posts: 1,275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papageno
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
Why thank you Papageno, just like old times isn't it? Have you brought your sandwiches? You may need them.
I will answer your other points later (have a meeting soon - no time) in the meantime which of the photon/electron interactions (compton, inverse compton, rayleigh, raman, Thompson etc) do you say occurs when photons of light are absorbed and re-emitted as the pass through glass? ie what name do you give to this interaction which certainly takes place.
What happens to photons going through a dielectric medium such as glass is irrelevant to your "theory".
You claim that photons going through intergalactic plasma lose energy due to scattering events.
IG plasma (free electrons) and glass (electrons bound to nuclei) have little to do with each other, despite your obvious misconceptions.
The fact that you are trying to tie the two together, already shows that you do not understand the issue.

As usual you are just trying to divert the attention from the fact that have nothing to support your idea.
The burden of proof is yours.
Objection over ruled.
In your post you complain about the name I give to this interaction. Well it is the same as happens in glass. If you say that 'my' effect is compton then are you saying that photons travel through glass by compton?
I think not. So come on Papageno stop avoiding the question, what is the name given to the interaction that enables photons to travel through glass.
Cheers,
Lyndon