Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
Still avoiding the question.
|
I already explained what is wrong with your question.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
I agree that mossbauer is not the ideal name but it is the nearest thing to it.
|
No crystal, no gamma rays, no Mossbauer.
No, your effect is nowhere near Mossbauer.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
So, since it is the same as the interaction in glass, what name to you give to this interaction? It is a simple question.
|
You are obviously in denial at this point.
I explained unambiguously that your "tired light" effect has nothing to do with the propagation of light in glass.
You, instead of addressing the issue, repeat the same misconception.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
It is you that is nit picking over names, so tell us.
|
Read my posts.
I
explain why the names are wrong.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
What do you call this interaction between photons and electrons in glass that we surely know happens - I gave two references in the post above.
|
References you do not understand or willfully misrepresent.
What is described in those quotes has nothing to do with your "tired light" effect.
You are trying to equate the interaction of photons with electric dipoles, to the interaction of photons with free charges.
This is a fundamental mistake you keep repeating.
By insisting on it, you are just digging your hole deeper and deeper.