Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fram
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
Brilliant!
This is what I love about this site! These armchair 'physicists' who post epic tombs castigating others on their 'lack of knowledge' when they have made one of the most appaling blunders themselves.
Who will be the first to spot Sylas' blunder. The post above is nonsense!
Should we start a thread entitled Sylas' blunder?
Maybe I should donate a prize, mmmmmmm not really feasible, but come on, who can spot Sylas' blunder?
Cheers,
Lyndon
|
Perhaps you would be wiser not to make such a big deal of a mistake from someone else when your own posts and website are riddled with them. My respect for you has dropped considerably after this post.
Can I remind you of what I said on page nine of this thread and which you completely ignored:
Quote:
from your Hubbleflow page, referenced on the above page:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
In a solid there are about 1030 atoms per cubic metre
|
Really?
|
I know I have made enough mistakes in my own posts here, so I usually don't gloat too much when I spot them in other peoples' posts, but you are asking for it. Your arrogance seems to be boundless. |
Lets not feel too sorry for Sylas, I am sure that he will agree that
"Those who live by the sword die by the sword"
As for the page on my website, yeh, thanks for pointing that out. I was in the process of updating it and as Sylas said, am swopping over from 'pagebuilder' software to 'frontpage'. The cut and paste lost something in the translation ('pagebuilder is hopeless with mathematical symbols). I will sort it and add some more to the site as soon as I have converted Papageno and Sylas over to Tired Light. Next week.
Cheers,
Lyndon