View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2002, 04:14 PM
DaveC DaveC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 721
Default

Quote:
On 2002-11-21 07:18, Donnie B. wrote:
Well, playing twinkies' advocate here, it wouldn't be that hard to come up with a non-LM explanation for such a bright spot. For instance, it could be a large boulder with a facet that just happened to be aligned so as to reflect the morning sun toward the CM.

Of course, this begs the question: how did we get the picture at all if there wasn't a CM in lunar orbit?
You haven't been paying attention to the "Twinkies". It's obviously a Hubble image, thereby proving that it can take closeups of the Moon - which proves that NASA has been lying about its capabilities - and that's why they won't point it at the Moon. To do so would prove there are no landing sites and LM descent stages left on the surface.
See - it's all logical - in Twinkie-logic anyway. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote