Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fortis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fortis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
I am not getting to Sylas at all. He is continuing to show his true colours here. Throughout this thread he has done his sums on light being longitudinal.
He has
|
What he did was simply applying the conservation of momentum and the conservation of energy, or are you claiming that Compton scattering also assumes a longitudinal photon?
Your treatment of the conservation problem appears to be that you balance the momentum, and then assume that the excess energy (no more and no less) is taken up by the rest of the plasma. You have not shown mathematically that this is so. |
So you are saying that Sylas' mistake is that he has done his sums on the wrong interaction?
Cheers,
Lyndon |
Not at all, just that by your logic, the standard treatment of Compton scattering must assume longitudinal photon.
By the way, you still haven't shown mathematically that exactly the correct amount of energy is taken up by the rest of the plasma. (And if the plasma is included to conserve energy, then why can it also not carry some of the momentum?) |
What we must all remember here gentlemen and Papageno, is that I am in a defensive position here. I did not post my theory on this site looking for advertisement. I did not post this thread. Papageno followed by Sylas attacked the theory. I am defending it. It is sufficient in these circumstances to defend by showing what utter tripe these two are suggesting. I will continue to do so. I have shown time and time again what nonsense they are talking about. That is all that is needed. I do want to talk about other things, but until I have put down this revolt we cannot do so. Whilst the theory is attacked I will defend.
Simple as that.
Quote:
[edited to improve ropy grammar  ]
|
prove it. |
Again, this one was edited before anyone responded, and it's not because you have been proven to remove posts where you make errors so blatant even you cannot deny them, that you can wildly accuse everyone else of doing the same. That's a very poor tactic, but desperate times call for desperate means, I suppose?
And you did post your theory in this site. You didn't start this thread, but you started the longer one. And you haven't shown anywhere that those two (and everyone else, I suppose) are suggesting utter tripe, although I can imagine they would be willing to suggest that as the title of your paper, if they were allowed that by the board rules and common standards of politeness.
They are talking about nonsense, but for some reason the creator of that nonsense, i.e. you, doesn't understand what this is all about, and refuses to back up anything with decent calculations, probably because he is unable to.
You are despicable.