Quote:
On 2002-11-25 09:53, Spaceman Spiff wrote:
Any scientific model makes predictions about the way nature behaves (among other things). If we observe nature and it does not behave at all in the way predicted, then the model either needs refinement or to be thrown into the trash heap (once the data are numerous and strong enough, that is).
|
Thanks for this. I already inspected Ned Wrights' pages. I think it can be regared as convincing evidence against some models for redshift.
A post I made earlier included a link to a photon-atom interaction theory.
http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/BIGBA...ng.html#Author
To me, it sounds reasonable convincing.
The assumption Paul Marmet makes however for this photon-atom interaction model is that the density of matter in intergalactic space is higher then the current estimate.
This might be due to the inperfect detection methods. As detection methods progress, this theory might become more acceptable.
If you (or anyone else) have convincing evidence this theory can't be regarded as a redshift mechanism, I am certainly willing to know about it.