Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
I'll note that despite numerous posts asking for a full-up quantitative calculation on the part of lyndonashmore, none has been given.
Is this calculation available on the web page you said was no longer online, lyndonashmore? If so, put it online and describe it, or post it here.
This is an extremely reasonable request, given that it appears to me that you have been obfuscating and avoiding answering questions for weeks now. When people argue for theories that are against the mainstream, I give them plenty of leeway (or rope, if you prefer that metaphor). But my patience is now up.
It's time to sit still, lyndonashmore, and answer the questions.
|
I must apologise BA for your having to intervene in this thread on two occasions now, but I assure you that it is not because of anything of my doing (or ‘not doing’ as the case may be).
I believe that This will answer your query in full and brings me up to date in answering all points regarding Tired Light on this thread. |
Not even close. You are being asked to answer some excruciatingly simple questions about YOUR interaction. Citations to other pages which do not describe your interaction are yet another irrelevant distraction; the very thing the BA is complaining about.
This citation is to a page about oscillations of an electron in an oscillating field. That is completely irrelevant to your alleged absorption reaction, in which a photon is absorbed. When the photon is absorbed, its oscillating fields are GONE. This has been pointed out before, and you've merely ignored it.
Another discrepancy is the frequency of oscillation while the photon is still engaged in the interaction is around 600 Terahertz; whereas you've previously invoked plasma oscillations of around 6 Hz or so. Which is it? Each interaction involves errors in basic physics. In the one case confusing motions of one electron with density waves in a whole plasma; and in the other case confusing oscillations driven while the electromagnetic wave is present with effects remaining after absorption of the wave.
And in none of these red herrings do we EVER get a simple balanced energy momentum budget for the Lyndon effect.
Your absorption reaction, as described in your paper, is a violation of the conservation laws of energy and momentum. You are being asked to give a balanced energy momentum budget, in which energy
and momentum in states before and after the alleged photon absorption are quantified and shown to be in balance.
I sympathize to some extent, because the question is impossible to answer. Photo absorption by electrons as you describe it is well known to be impossible due to inevitable violations of energy momentum conservation.
Cheers -- Sylas