Thread: Ashmore's "paradox" Reloaded.
View Single Post
  #613 (permalink)  
Old 13-June-2005, 10:00 AM
papageno's Avatar
papageno papageno is offline
Order of Kilopi
  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greater London
Posts: 3,374
Send a message via MSN to papageno
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
In fact, I like others have lost patience with both yours and Papageno's complaints. You have had the maths you were wrong.
It must be really frustrating for you to discuss physics with somebody who actually understands it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
All that is left is for yourself and Papageno to put fingers to the keyboard and type an apology,
Lyndon you were correct , we were wrong.
Where is your full calculation in support of your theory?
Or are you still convinced that a single photon and a macroscopic EM wave are the same thing?


Quote:
Originally Posted by lyndonashmore
I won't hold my breath.
However, as far as I am concerned this point is now finished. I have given ample proof. Those of you who are in denial can ignore it if you wish but the Tired Light theory stands.
I sent a PM to the BA: let's see if he agrees with you.
__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

"...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation)