View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2005, 10:51 AM
formulaterp formulaterp is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 390
Send a message via Yahoo to formulaterp
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
Thor could be built fairly cheaply ... <snip>

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammo1j
I think there are far cheaper and accurate ways to achieve the military capability of this device.
Yes, and each of those ways costs a few hundred thousand dollars to expend <snip> ... And if you had hundreds of these ...

OK. Let's look at some numbers. Please feel free to correct me if I have made any grievous errors.

Assume your rods are 1 foot x 20 foot cylinders of pure tungsten.
Therefore each rod = 15.7 cubic feet = 0.44 cubic meters (approx).
The density of tungsten = 19,250 kg per cubic meter.
Each rod then has a mass of around 8,500 kg's. The 100 rods you want in orbit will have a mass of 850,000 kg's.

The most powerful rocket in the current US inventory is the Boeing Delta IV Heavy. According to Boeing, it has the capability to loft a bit less than 22,000 kg into low earth orbit. In order to deploy your payload, you would need the equivalent of 39 launches. Each launch costs about $300 million. Thus your total program costs (just to LAUNCH it) will run somewhere around $11.7 BILLION.

And this is a cost effective means to do what now?

How exactly would this be any better than taking a Minuteman III, removing the nuclear warhead(s) and replacing them with a chunk of, ... oh I don't know .... tungsten?

Personally I'd stick with our tried and true methods, which according to you only require a couple hundred thousand a pop.

So the real answer to the original question: Is there any way to stop Rods from God? Why yes, it's called fiscal responsibility.