Well, forgive me if I've gotten a wee testy. I didn't start the ridicule however, you folks did that all on your own. If you dish it out, you best be able to take some as well. In Baloo's defense, I believe you are right and my reaction was probably more of an overreaction.

What I resent is this whole notion that I don't know anything about these issues and I've never thought about this stuff (like black body radiation) before. I resent that whole attitude. It's belittling and you folks know it. You've picked on me as an individual since I got here, implying I didn't know what I was talking about and acting like a piece of paper on the wall or lack thereof was the best judge of the character of a man. I resent that whole attititude and I expect you all to back off and address this "scientifically" from here on.

I've asked some very important and basic questions that have not been addressed by anyone "scientifically".

For instance:

Why is more logical to believe the sun is NOT compose of the same materials as planets?

Why does Hubble see silicon and iron and neon as far back in time as we can see?

Why do supernovas display this same "ferrite->calcium->silicon" layering system that we see on our own sun?

I've presented evidence from a half dozen different satellites and no one has addressed any of it. I'm sick of that attitude. I came here looking for a serious scientific discussion. What's its been to this point is a lot of trash talking and holier than thou attitude.