View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-July-2005, 07:00 PM
hippietrekx's Avatar
hippietrekx hippietrekx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humphrey
First of all they need to tie up B&B, throw them into a sack and hit them with large concrete blocks untill they promise never to step onto a studio, direct/produce, or even look at a scripts again. Without a doubt they are the #1 and #2 reasons for the failure of Star Trek. Want proof? Look at the episode they have produced/directed and written vs those by the other trek directors. Massive difference.
Exactly. You can't have a solid seven years (three under ENT and what, four(?) under VOY) of Berman's obsession with bad writing, reset buttons, and time travel without thoroughly jading the fans. Even Star Trek fans.

Brannon Braga = Bad.
Rick Berman = Bad (and then some).
Manny Coto = Good.
I'm a major Star Trek fan. TNG is my favorite TV show (I praise the syndication gods). I liked time travel in Trek-verse when it was used with great caution and in drastic situations {and maybe once or twice in seven years}. Since Bergman became the un-official king of Trek time travel became standard. Something so fantastic gets boring after a while.

And I really didn't like ENT. The concept was good, the characaters were good, but the way they were used... were terrible. I think I've seen parts of every episode, but not one episode fully. The writing just didn't hold me to the show. I couldn't sit through an entire episode without changing the channel or picking up a book. It just seemed like Berman borrowed all of the ideas from the other trek series and haphazardly glues them together to make a show. ENT felt like a re-run. A bad re-run, because I like re-runs...

--htx
__________________
Visit Mutated Genes, my X-men fanart site.

I heart Ducky. I stalk Ducky. His hair is quite fluffy, and he makes good cookies. (And now he's my prom date...)
Reply With Quote