Now i have read every story seen every picture
Really? You've studied every one of the tens of thousands of still photographs of Apollo development, testing, operations, and lunar photographs? Including the Mercury and Gemini photographs - they were part of the Apollo development program, after all? You've read all the histories, accounts, and transcripts? I'm truly impressed.

and the evidence is not in NASAs favor,
Funny, I've seen flight hardware, photographs, film and video, read some of the history, seen some of the transcripts, and worked for and with people who actually worked on Apollo, people who designed and built the hardware. The evidence looks in NASA's favor to me - of course, I'm just an engineer who's been working in the space field for 15 years.

and the resons NASA gave for some of the evidence was something you would hear in a playground.
Be specific. Handwaving doesn't support your point. I could just as well point out the the reasons the hoax believers give for some of their "evidence" is something you'd hear in an insane asylum.

Same with a lot of the footage there are mistakes.
There may be things you don't understand, but that does not automatically make them "mistakes" (by which you mean evidence of a hoax). Please be specific, but I also strongly recommend you use the Search feature to see if a particular claim you wish to make has already been addressed.

You also should consider that, say, a shadow which cannot be explicitly traced to a certain object does not necessarily "prove" a fake. I can look at pictures of the D-Day landings and see things I can't explain. Does that mean the D-Day landings were fake? The burden of proof lies with you, the hoax claimant, and the bar is set quite high given the truly massive weight of physical, personal, documentary, and scientific evidence for Apollo.

BTW, welcome to the board.