Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nutant gene 71
In papageno's last big post I counted at least 10 times where he says I'm "wrong" or "don't understand", so must accept this as my failure. In my previous incarnation (as "Lunatik" now in permanent 'safing') I had shown a paper on Atomic Mass with some mathematical scratchings on how G is different for each orbital region (which happens to unexpectedly grow at the rate of one G per AU), but then too I was told how wrong I was, or didn't understand, by the same parties, so pulled it from its site for review (it's up for peer review at the moment).
|
Let's be clear: it has been
shown and
explained where you are wrong.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nutant gene 71
I don't have the answers, and would not have them unless further astrophysical research measured a different Newton's G, which has not happened. So I remain isolated with my conceptual conundrum, which is okay with me, as it is something on which I can further meditate.
|
We tried to get you out of your coneptual conudrum, but you simply dismiss our explanations by saying that we just would not understand.
Now, do you understand that
kilogram-mass is not the same as
kilogram-weight?