Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eta C
Tell us why a gaseous (or liquid) surface can't have emissions at several different frequencies.
|
Why would I do that? I don't believe that in the first place.
Quote:
|
What you've got there Mike is an image of two sunspots. What we're seeing are the plasma prominences following the magnetic field lines between them. These prominences project far above the sun's surface.
|
Nope. Try again.
Quote:
|
Going back a couple of posts, just because the LockMart site (link please.
|
It's right in the photo. I got it from their page in fact. It's LINKED to their pages. Right click on the photo and pick "properties".
Quote:
|
even if you've provided it before it's courteous to link to the original site when showing info from it.) showed the various frequencies as "stacked layers" doesn't mean that these represent actual "physical" layers.
|
The aren't physical layers. They are ion emissions in three different wavelengths that all originate from the SAME layer.
Quote:
|
In the absence of a link, you should tell us what frequencies the various pictures represent and what element produced the observed spectral line.
|
171, 195 and 284 angstroms. They are ALL emitted from either FE IX, FE X, FE XII or FE XV ions. All of these arcs originate from the SAME surface points.
Quote:
|
You know something, I just come to a realization. Mike possibly believes that the different frequencies represented in the SOHO imagery must come from separate solid layers. (I invite you to correct me if I'm wrong here Mike, no attempts to set up scarecrows). If one of the frequencies is from an iron spectral line it would explain his insistence that there is an iron layer. Of course, there's a big leap from saying that there is some iron in the sun to claiming that there's a solid iron surface with hollow resonance gaps beneath it.
|
It's pretty clear that you haven't a CLUE what you are talking about again and you are again attempting to undermine my credibility by personal attack. That is NOT impressive in the least.
You have THREE DIFFERENT KINDS of ions here all originating from the same surface points, the surface you claim isn't there. According to the gas model, these arcs must be mystical arcs ather than simple electrical arcs I presume? This surface that these arcs originate can't be iron even though all the ions coming from these features are from iron ions?