Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
*In my opinion* he doesn't understand the concept of "blackbody temperature."
|
IIRC Feynman said something like "it is better to not know than knowing and be wrong". Well, at list I've tried, I think my skills in english and pedagogy don't allow me to be more persuasive than that. :roll:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Michael Mozina
No, I mean POSITRONS.
|
From the
link (wikipedia) I've posted earlier: "A positron is the antiparticle of the electron. It is antimatter, has an electric charge of +1, a spin of 1/2, and the same mass as an electron. When a positron annihilates with an electron, their mass is converted into energy in the form of two gamma ray photons."
Now, is this the particle you're talking about or something else?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Michael Mozina
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Baloo
Let's make an experiment: will look from the Earth' s orbit down to the Atlantic ocean with an infrared camera. The image will look like: that . Full of cracks, isnt'it? Especially the big red one, very clear on a visual inspection...well, I bet that the Atlantic ocean has no cracks in it, even if in this photo one is clearly visible.
(the explanation of what are we really seeing here ) |
You're big on the strawmen today aren't you? |
Actually I was very serious; interpreting an image whitout knowing how it was obtained is not recomended at all and could lead to completely wrong conclusions.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Michael Mozina
You THINK, but you don't KNOW
|
I think your sentence resumes in the best way this thread. Yes, I think first and only after that I claim to know. It seems that you're disagree with this way to reach a conclusion, therefore I see no reason to continue this discussion since this has ceased to be a scientific debate (if it ever was... :-? )