Mr. Mozina:

Here's a quote from http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/model.htm?
"The sun's inner fission reactions act as a huge, seemingly infinite, fission battery while the surface acts as a giant discharge lamp, with the core constantly releasing positrons and surface constantly emitting and adsorbing electrons."

Would you care to explain how immense amounts of gamma radiation from these positrons colliding with electrons haven't been observed by any of our satellites?

Perhaps you meant "protons".

Also, I note in this sequence of images a large black feature in the lower left quadrant of images:
2005/05/29 19:13
2005/05/30 05:48
2005/05/30 13:13
2005/05/30 19:13
2005/05/31 05:46
This feature appears to distend consistent with the equatorial regions of the observed layer rotating faster than the more polar regions. How does your model explain this?

Finally, you say, in essence, that most of the sun's light is provided by a neon layer. I grant you that neon spectral lines are, in fact, observed in the sun's spectrum. However, if your neon layer is in fact providing most of the sun's light, the sun's spectrum should look more like a blackbody curve than a plasma gas spectrum - in other words, the sun's spectrum should be dominated by neon. How do you explain this discrepancy between your model and observation?

Thank you for your time, Mr. Mozina. You may stop reading now, as everything below this line is an unsubstantiated and really rather rude ad hominem attack.

People, this guy seems to be nothing but a crackpot. Anyone who doesn't know the difference between a positron and a proton doesn't hold a lot of credibility in my book. I postulate that Mr. Mozina wasn't paying much attention during his high school physics classes, especially when they talked about spectra of radiation and subatomic particles.

[edited to conform a little better to board policy - my apologies again.]