Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fortis
I still don't see how this has anything to do with the universe rotating once every 22 years, unless you are claiming a heliocentric model of the universe. (Not to be confused with a heliocentric model of the solar system.)
|
No, I'm suggesting just the opposite of a heliocentric model. I'm suggesting the whole universe spins within an electromagnetic field that is constantly accelerating these balls of iron as they spin through space. I used the 22 year cycle because it suggests that the suns core stays aligned with the univeral field while the universe itself spins.
Quote:
|
I have already said that you appear to be confusing lensing with deflection.
|
I'm going to drop this whole issue if you don't mind because it really has nothing to do with the model I have presented or anything related to this model. At this point it's a lot to do about nothin'.
Quote:
|
This also means that you still haven't justified your original accusation.
|
My original statement is still relevant. I have no idea how many of the neutrinos that were accounted for in these experiments actually came from the sun, or were deflected into the experiment and counted as coming from the sun. This particular issue is one of the main reason I did NOT suggest a neutrino count in the first place associated with my model and also because I was still unsure about an energy source at that point (fusion vs. fission). I've pretty much made up my mind over the fusion fission issue, but the amount of energy coming from the rotation itself is still unknown. What I resented was being treated as though I didn't have a right to ask such questions or that such considerations were invalid when I first suggested them.
Like I said however, I'm REALLY done with this issue. It has nothing to do with my model.