Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nutant gene 71
(3) So why doesn't this show up in our orbitals or trajectories? Does it even matter as some suggested, that it is a null sum game? I think it does not show up, but it does matter.
G*M is what always rules, that the product of any (hypo) G adjusted for its native kilograms will always be the same. The Sun has an Earth derived mass of M = ~2E+30 kg (assuming Sun has 1G, which may not be true), so Saturn's mass (in hypo 10G) still answers to the inverse square law 1/R^2, because the product of G*M is still the same. And the same for the Sun responding to Saturn's gravitational attraction, where (10G*0.10m) is still the same product, so nothing changed with regards to their orbital relationship, the barycenter is unaffected, and neither would be their LaGrange points.
|
nutant
I'm sorry, but I don't understant your words. Let's talk again in numbers, if we could.
I would calculate the following:
1) Sun Mass: ~2 e 30 kg
2) G = 6.67e-11 m3 kg-1 s-2
3) Saturn gravitational mass: 5.7 e26 kg
4) Saturn inertial mass: 5.7e26 kg
5) Saturn dist from Sun (assume circle for now): 1.43 e12 m
6) Saturn "weight" (gravity force toward sun) = 3.7e22 N
7) Saturn acceleration toward sun: 6.52 m/s2
Could you calculate these seven numbers in your theory:
1) Sun Mass (I believe you said you agree that it's ~2 e 30 kg)
2) G : (I believe you said this is 66.7e-11, or 6.67e-10m3 kg-1 s-2)
3) Saturn gravitational mass
4) Saturn inertial mass
5) Saturn dist from Sun (assume circle for now)
6) Saturn "weight" (gravity force toward sun)
7) Saturn acceleration toward sun
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nutant gene 71
BTW2, pgh, I think you have a typo in yours
"If Titan's mass is 1.35e23 in Earth's 1G measure, then it's mass is 1.35e23 in its 10G environment."
Did you not mean to say that it's mass in 10G environment its mass "m" = 0.135E+23 "kg"?
|
No, that wasn't a typo --- you see, I still am not seeing why mass would change.