Fraser,

I am wanting to know how you choose your moderators.

Do you do it by their knowledge? Or do you do it by the amount of posts they have? If you base your decision on knowledge, how do you confirm their claims?

I would be interested in knowing where the experts you have to answer questions, spend most of their time with this forum. Meaning what topics they address in this forum.

I am interested in learning facts, and in order to do so with this forum, I believe i would be best to follow these credited experts in the topics they mainly deal in. Quite honestly, im tired of reading the same posters and their"views" over and over again, and im tired of the whole evolution thing being brought into most of the topics. They are tainting your wonderful forum, and when your moderators begin bashing presidents, I question your choices!

Its begining to be offensive fraser. I didnt come here to have your moderator bash president bush, much less try to force feed us with "views". It wouldnt be bad if they posted once or twice in a topic, but to re post over and over again, to every post they dont agree with, and to have them monopolize the forum with crap is no learning environment or much fun!

So please, educate us on your choices and how you came to them, and where the real experts are PLEASE... Before they make a joke of your efforts...