People on both sides need to tone things down. But you have to ask yourselves, if you tell someone over and over and over the fallacies in their arguments and show them how science doesn't back up their ideas, and they continue to spout them as truth, when is enough enough? It doesn't make sense to continue to argue for a theory which is obviously incorrect. The electric cosmos theory is obviously wrong. Just read the thread. I don't think VanderL himself has been called a wacko. The theory he argued for, however,is obviously is a bit wacky given all the evidence. His search for the truth has to be commended and his asking so many questions lately instead of just saying "well this is what i believe so there" is damn impressive. Takes a lot to question the things you hold as truth.

__________________
1·618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805 76286213544862270526046281890244970720720418939113 74