Ah, I love a lively debate! :P

I have to throw my 2 cents' worth in... Isn't it true that this "electric cosmos" model claims that stars are like electrical generators - not nuclear reactors? I find this an incredible claim. It goes against ALL of physics, not just cosmology. I can't see how anybody could claim this, when after all atoms have been split & nuclear explosions unleashed right here on Earth!!!

The other "argument" for this electric cosmos theory is the "case of the missing neutrinos". As far as I can ascertain, this WAS a problem for physicists years ago...but not anymore, as the neutrinos mutate on their way out of the Sun (supported by experiments from CERN, FermiLab etc).

Besides, I have to wonder, if neutrinos can travel unheeded through solid lead a lightyear thick...how could we possibly detect them???

Craters are formed, not by meteorites, but lightning strikes? Wow, that's a mighty one! Chalk that one up for originality! But how come we don't see lightning on the Moon?

I'm the first to advocate a good challenge to the Establishment...rough it up a bit...poke sticks at it...but I don't see the electric-universe model quite cutting the cake, I'm afraid!?