View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2004, 04:08 AM
om@umr.edu om@umr.edu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,234
Default

Thanks, Duane and Antoniseb, for your comments.

I apologize for repeating myself. :unsure:

In addition to old age, there is another likely reason I will explain below*.

You are correct, Duane, "Current solar theories are based on modelling..."

Antoniseb wants a model "to explain why the Iron shouldn't simply collapse onto the inner neutron star." :blink:

However, I make measurements, not models. The interior of the Sun reveals itself to me in measurements - - - not models. Perhaps that is what distinguishes experimentalists from astronomers. Perhaps that is why our communications are leading nowhere! :unsure:

*I repeat myself asking you to address measurements. For example, over a week ago on this web site I asked the two of you to explain six experimental observations listed in our 2002 SOHO/GONG conference paper: http://web.umr.edu/~om/abstracts2002/soho-gong2002.pdf

1. Why were there two distinct types of xenon, Xe-1 and Xe-2, at the birth of the solar system [Figure 1]?

2. Why did primordial Helium accompany Xe-2 (strange xenon) and not Xe-1 (normal xenon) when meteorites formed [Figure 2]?

3. Why does the Jupiter's He-rich atmosphere contain Xe-2 (strange xenon) (p. 346)?

http://web.umr.edu/~om/abstracts2001/windl...leranalysis.pdf

4. Why are light mass (L) isotopes in the solar wind enriched relative to heavy mass (H) isotopes by a common fractionation factor (f), where log (f) = 4.56 log (H/L) [This is shown in Figure 5 and discussed on pp. 346-347.]?

5. When the above empirical equation is applied to elements in the photosphere, why does it indicate that the interior of the Sun consists mostly of Fe, O, Si, Ni, S, Mg and Ca, the same elements as that comprise 99% of ordinary meteorites (p. 347)?

6. The statistical probability that this agreement is fortuitous is <0.000000000000000000000000000000002. How do mainstream views explain that?

As I recall, you offered no explanation for any of these observations.

Regretfully, I suggest we waste no more time on this pseudo-communications.
Otherwise, you will probably start repeating yourself asking me to explain a model.

With kind regards,

Oliver
http://www.umr.edu/~om