View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2003, 09:31 PM
TriangleMan's Avatar
TriangleMan TriangleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Qatar
Posts: 3,528
Default

Quote:
On 2003-01-22 16:55, Bossieman wrote:

Do I have too prove it? A theory is correct until it has been proven wrong.
We know that both QM and GR cant be 100% correct. But we use them because they have not been proven wrong in any experiment what I know of.
I think you meant to say this another way since the logic of this paragraph goes:

-- theory is correct until proven wrong
-- QM and GR have not been proven wrong

therefore QM and GR are correct, why do you "know" they are wrong?

Anyway, that's just me being picky [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

What I was actually posting about was that your theory has not made any predictions yet. I realize that this theory is still being worked out and translated but so far your description goes as follows:

1) Describe some nature of the universe (ex. earth goes around sun)
2) Explain it in LESA terms
3) Therefore the theory works

But I could just as easily replace LESA explanations with religious ones:

1) The earth goes around the sun
2) God made it do so
3) Therefore God exists

No offense to all you geocentrists out there. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]

So please help us out by doing the following:

Give examples of phenomena, that if shown to exist, would prove your LESA theory wrong and tell us why these examples would disprove your theory.