Quote:
Originally posted by Nereid@Apr 25 2005, 12:26 AM
Quote:
|
Hossein does not disagree with general relativity.
|
So, are there ANY differences between the two, in terms of what we can observe (either in the distant universe, or in experiments in the lab)?
If not, then why throw out GR in favour of CPH?
If there are, what are they?
Quote:
|
So far what is missing are formulations of "standing interactions" which we would recognize as fundamental particles such as electrons, positrons, etc.
|
OK, you've issued your invitation - let's see if anyone wants to help.
To what extent is CPH consistent with Quantum Field Theory? For example, is CPH's relationship to QFT the same as its relationship to GR (i.e. no observable differences)?
Until we have some answers to the above questions, I'd like to ask that there be no more lengthy posts here.
|
CPH developed QFT to sub quantums.
In fact CPH Theory combined chalassical mechanic, Relativity and quantum mechanic.