View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 13-July-2005, 07:54 AM
VanderL VanderL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,590
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dave_f+Jul 13 2005, 06:01 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (dave_f @ Jul 13 2005, 06:01 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-om@umr.edu@Jul 12 2005, 06:04 PM
Silicates are abundant in many rocks. Made of elements #8 and higher.

Oliver
http://www,umr.edu/~om
The comet discussion on this forum so far has been dominated by three individulals (4, including myself, but I'm not really important enough to be counted into the mix).

All I can say is that this exploration has produced benefits beyond previous understandings. Unless this experiment had occurred at all, we would not have had the opportunity to discuss this matter to begin with. Let us remember that, far all the importance given to theory, nothing trumps actual observation and interpretation. We can all stand here and trunp "Electric Universe" over "Plasma Universe" over end-all. But, in the reality we exist in today, none of these things cannot be validated without good-old-fashioned exploration.

Nothing shakes a "theory" more than looking the facts square in the face. [/b][/quote]
Couldn't agree more, observations are the way forward, well said dave_f.
I know some people are relying more on math and the theories they produce, but I'm more an observationalist, I want to see data first.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote