Dear Excal

I hope my suggestions do not come off too much as criticisms; the intent is to clarify. It is from my perspective which is biased from a personal theoretical model that I am being particular at to how you use the term “space”.

You said
“The term "distance" indicates a span of space measured by a velocity over time. Thus, ds = v*dt. However, we can also indicate the same measure of space in terms of an interval of time. Thus, dt = ds/v. This fact reveals that velocity may be interpreted as a meter of space and time wherein it, in a sense, creates space (distance), given time, or time (interval), given space.”

This confuses, for me, the difference between the meaning of distance and space. ( more specifically, note “creates space (distance)”

Defining “space” is not that easy, but blurring the distinction or meaning between the words “distance” and “space” only makes things worse. Looking ahead, once time is integrated into the relationships of spatial configurations, the description of what is Spacetime, will become particularly confusing.

This apparently minor issue is more important to me than most, which is a result of my own theoretical perspective. Since my theoretical perspective is unique and not conventional, my suggestions may or not have any validity. It is rude to interject one’s own personal “agenda” on another’s thread, so I will refrain from interjecting too much of my ideas on your work.

Snowflake