Real scientists don't "get" to "believe" anything. They are only allowed to think what existing theories and math allow them to. Unless you happen to be very good at tensor calculus and analysis, and can show us how the things general relativity predicts are wrong, and can then use GR and quantum mechanics to show that your model predicts exactly what's observed (i.e., spectra and structures observed from black holes), then you have no idea what you're talking about. [who relies on real physics for support.]

And the big bang does not directly violate any physical theory. If it did, it would not be an accepted theory. The only problem is that you don't understand what's really going on. What you "armature" scientists fail to understand is that your lack of understanding of a theory means just that, you do not understand the theory, it does not mean that the theory is wrong. And matter isn't conserved, anyway, it never was. Mass-energy is, there's a big difference there. I can create matter all I want, in fact, i do it every day in chemical reactions that take place inside my body, because the binding energy in chains of atoms is added to its measured mass.

Stars do collapse from surrounding material. We can actually see this happening. Look into a nebula. Saying they somehow condense out of material doesn't even make sense. Temperature in the material increases due to increasing pressure caused by collapsing material until fusion starts. Or do you not believe in fusion, either?