View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2005, 11:17 PM
Michael Mozina Michael Mozina is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Posts: 926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by publiusr
I was watching the program 'Parallel Universes' and they had wonderful graphics showing the ripples of the branes and how that was responsible for the clumping.

OT I was wondering if the topological defect known as domain walls and textures--2D and 3D versions of Cosmic superstrings--might be pieces of 'naked (exposed) brane'. I also wonder if there may be a different imprint beyond the more usual warping of space-time by gravity--a different imprint obviating the need for missing mass--that might actually show its influence away from mass--by deep space probes deviating (over more than a solar system width tho').

Also--could exposed branes allow for some of the energy mass of a nearby budding universe to be shunted across--coming out of the exposed brane--and allowing the steady state folks some hope for at least some continued influx of matter--albeit in a smaller scale?

It just bums me out how everything is just going to be a void--with our galaxy being left alone.

If time pre-existed the Big Bang (as suggested by that Horizon program), could we learn the physics of branes by observing domain walls if we are so lucky as to see one?
It is very hard for me to believe we are "alone" at all. In fact I suspect as we build better satellites, we'll find that what we call our physical universe (matter left after events at 0,0,0,0) is but one of many such events. The first law of thermodynamics insists that the energy to create this universe has existed eternally. The only question that remains is did matter predate the events of 0,0,0,0?
Reply With Quote