View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2005, 11:24 PM
Michael Mozina Michael Mozina is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Posts: 926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HenrikOlsen
You have it the wrong way around.

We think hydrogen is the most abundant because that is what we see. Then we try to explain where it comes from, and the big bang is a good explanation.
The big bang is a POSSIBLE explanation. It's not the ONLY possible explanation. That's what I'm trying to suggest here. Even though we can plot trajectories of galaxies backwards in time, we cannot be sure that matter itself was created in this event. We ASSUME this. We BELIEVE this is the case. We do not KNOW this is the case.

What we SEE are photons. These photons are collected and measured. Someone had the idea that the amount of photons collected could help us determine overall composition. While I trust that it helps us to know while elements are present for certain, that method does not tell us what is NOT visible, or not emitting photons.
Reply With Quote