View Single Post
  #259 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2005, 05:51 AM
Faultline's Avatar
Faultline Faultline is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosheh Thezion
Neutron stars exploding into galaxies???? what???
are we talking about the same neutron stars??
-MT
Well, maybe you didn't say exactly that you think neutron stars expand into galaxies, but I pulled this quote from "Mosheh Thezion's Cosmology" thread:

(Your Words, MT)
Quote:
If the idea of that matter is not limited to being tiny neutrons/ protons is precievable.
Then that is the fundamental idea that can allow you to reason away the mandatory need to believe that matter began as tiny atoms..
Their existance begs the question.. of what if..
and if you follow that idea we quickly come to the top down proposal i have shown.
where a big bang lead to chunks. of supercluster size, which exploded into galaxy size chunks.. which then exploded into solar system size chunks, which exploded into nucleons which became atoms for us, 4.6 billion years ago, and formed our solar system.

that simple idea. of matter not limited to existance as tiny nucleons.. opens the door, so to speak.

Because that is real evidense.. neutron stars exist.. dwarfs exist..
and all stars leave them behind.. not just some stars, all stars.

all galaxys may have a giant black hole core?
well now we see that it doesnt have to be a black hole.
Just something very dense.. nucleon dense.

and that the math we use to calculate the density(black hole density) that would be caused by gravity, is simply wrong.

we use calculations and formula for the world of atoms, to explain the behavior of things which are not made of atoms.!
Now can you see where I got the idea that you think "nucleons" expand into galaxies? I always think of a neutron star when you say, "nucleon" anyway.
__________________
My son is my universe.
Reply With Quote