Thanks for the interest and reponses! Good questions, and I will respond from the top down.

baka wrote;
[How is an infinity "reached"?]...The simple truth is that we have no idea what infinity is reached to create a singularity!

String “M” Theory says that when the membranes touch it causes a singularity, so, the most likely place the infinity is reached is in the membranes.

There has been no scientific proof of any properties or infinities of a singularity!

The 3 statements above are all directly from my paper, and what I am saying is simply this...The 'assumption' that the infinity that is reached to create a singularity is 'infinite density', the whole universe being locked up inside the Friedmann naked singularity is wrong. For proof of this just look at the singularity results...The GRB singularity is "a specific point in space" (like it is supposed to be), is an explosion (like it's supposed to be), and creates a black hole (like it is supposed to)...there have numerous things writen, saying that if a singularity made our universe, our universe should be in a black hole. I believe that is because the breaking of E=MC squared in an explosion is the definition of a singularity.? The Big Bang singularity has always been 'stretched' to try to meet the above qualifications of a singularity.

[How is E=mc^2 "broken"?] just answered, I believe

[So the singularities of each theory, by virtue of being undefined, are how the theories become unified?]... not exactly, The Big Bang and "M" Theory both say the singularity made the whole universe, I'm saying that singularities make Galaxies not Universe's.

[I notice that you didn't mention what the process for Dark Energy is. If your cosmology has no inflationary period, is there even a need for it?]...I can predict right here, that there is going to be a huge controversy about "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy",the ether, the cosmological constant,repulsive force, because sometimes they are being interchanged incorrectly. There definitely needs to be a global scientific unification and precise defintions for these terms. For example, I have definitely seen where MACHO's have been included with Dark Matter when talking about the rotation of galaxies. MACHO's are Bayonic matter and shouldn't be included that way.
As for inflation, my model definitely does not need it, since there was a 1st galaxy in a very much smaller "Dark Matter" expanding universe and the galaxies get here one day at a time...the universe has expanded as it has added 365 billion galaxies each 1 billion years.