Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fram
Done. So 4D is another circle than 0D. And in 4D, the remnants of space after the explosion move in two directions, not diagonal. 2 directions is 2D, so 4D is already a 2D dimension, not a 0D dimension. Your dimensional rise is thus not symmetrical, which it should be in your ideas. The next explosion would occur at 6D, not at 8D.
And a reason for any of this (or even a decent definition) is still lacking. An explanation why anything would raise a dimension, and why that would result in anything, is lacking. Evidence of any of these dimensional rises is lacking.
You pointing to e.g. superclusters, quasars, or whatever, and saying that they are evidence, is not the same as having any evidence. You have to show that there is a connection between the two, that the existence of reality follows from the math, the formulas, the theory.
|
No.. its about patterns.... and when you contemplate the making of a 3D space from a zero point something...
one must realise that zero is a number.. and so is.. .99
As is.. 1.89... and the idea that we can, as in big bang, explode directly from zero to 3 is where i make an arguement.
I propose it cannot do so.. and must rise up.. threw progressive levels.
For Logic tells us.. we cannot begin with the 2nd dimension.. Unless we already have the 1st dimension.....
I.e.. Instead of a crude explosion, why not a natural progressive rise following a natural progression threw what we know of as dimensional levels.. from 0D.... to .99D... to 1D.. to 2D... to 3D... to 3.9 D.
that is four 90 degree angles.. or one full circle motion.
And we will notice that the zero D, is quite mysterious, as it must have been expansive, but how, and in what way, is still questionalble.
The 4D rise i take from Carl Sagan and others, who discuss it as Time, and still in relation to hypercubes, balloon expansion, and relativity concepts.
So if we impose the idea of what we all believe to be the 4th dimension apon a dimensional progression of VECTOR FORCES, we end up with ideas that will probubly sound like mine.
And then at 8D we see again, this step requires an expansion quality, which just so happens to fit into the pattern so far.. as seen in 0D, and 4D, then here again at 8D... this is discussed as the "Timing Scale Patterns"
do you will to discuss that specifically?
-MT
