View Single Post
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 07-October-2005, 01:55 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 8,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brendan
There's a paper here http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0507619 that says they used general relativity to explain galaxy rotation curves without needing dark matter. It's from astro-ph, so I guess it's not woo woo and has too much math in it to be woo woo. Did anybody know about this paper? Had any errors been found in it or is it the unfounding of dark matter?
It's worth taking a look. Hard to believe that under "the weak gravitational fields under consideration" (quote from the abstract) that general relativity would make that much of a difference, though. If their (Cooperstock and Tieu, University of Victoria, with some recognition from the Gravity Research Foundation) calculations are correct, maybe the original ones (that showed a dark matter halo) are wrong.
Reply With Quote