Nereid, some questions arise from your comments. Regarding the Brookhaven experiment, and temperatures involved, if Planck or post-Planck conditions are thought to be enormously hot, what is it that is hot? As I read ‘heat’, it is a transfer of energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation between bodies of matter. At what temperature, if any, do BB ‘theories’ predict that they no longer can predict the existence of ‘heat‘?

Regarding the comment about spooky GR (that ‘empty’ space doesn’t do anything - it’s the matter/mass-energy that leads to expansion), does GR contain a mathematical description for ‘empty’ space, like a kind of ‘inert field’, or is it that space-like characteristics arise out of the mathematics, or do these characteristics exist only as spatial measurements? If the addition of matter/mass-energy to ‘empty’ space leads to expansion, what is it that expands?

Regarding a ‘Theory of Everything’, the scenario I described is a ‘scenario of everything.‘ I am suggesting that someone (with more mathematical ability than me) should attempt (if they aren’t already) to describe a system in which a volume of ‘space’ is treated as a dynamic expanding field in such a way that ‘matter’ (as a manifestation of converging space-time co-ordinates) evolves as the field’s response to its own pressure.

Monique said, “I tell you big secret. You will die sometime. Is not cold-blooded is simple, inescapable, fact. Is your responsibility to find meaning, purpose within given constraints.”

Constraints imposed by non-science masquerading as science require me to find purpose in a purposeless universe. So it is my responsibility to attempt to remove these constraints, since I find the universe manifests endless purpose - growth - with harmony as its sign.