View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-October-2005, 07:14 AM
Sylwester Kornowski Sylwester Kornowski is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 394
Exclamation New Cosmology (discussion of Sylwester Kornowski's ideas)

In 1996 I foresaw the new state of matter discovered in 2005 by Wolfgang Ketterle from MIT. This state I described in my scientific book "THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE". The book is now registered in International Journal of Theotetical Physics. Contents a nd general idea of it you can find on www.cosmology-particles.pl
Below you can find the PREFACE to this book. If you are interested in some details please send your question.
PREFACE
In the Ketterle group experiment with the whirling atomic fermion clouds in very low temperature appears the real nature of microcosm (i.e. the superfluidity in the background of the Universe) and this experiment confirms that our conception of that is incorrect. My theory foresees such structures in the cores of the nucleons and the neutrino. In this ultimate theory of the Universe vortices (i.e. whirling toruses) are omnipresent. The surface of neutrino is built of toruses whirling analogically as a tropical cyclone and axes of them are placed perpendicular to the surface of neutrino (the surface of the core of nucleon is built of the neutrinos) the same as in the Ketterle experiment. These axes overlap with the force lines of the weak charge of neutrino. On the surface of the neutrino (also on the surface on nucleon) there is duplicated identical layer (from toruses the background of the Universe is built of) but distances between toruses are minimal longer (it is virtual particle) and such surface is unstable then expands (see chapter Types of Interactions). In my opinion this Ketterle group experiment is most important in last decades and my theory gives possibility to prove it.
There does not exist the quark-gluon plasma then the Standard Model is incorrect. My new theory of the structure of hadrons was completed in 1985.
From experimental data it results that the massive superquasars existed since the beginning of the Big Bang then the Cosmological Standard Model is incorrect. My new theory of the Big Bang and evolution of the Universe and the other elementary particles was completed in 1997.
There does not exist answer to question: what does accelerate the expansion of our World?
Why the ratio of the real energy of the vacuum to the energy of the vacuum which we observe is equal to about 10^120 (from my theory it results that this ratio is equal to 0.6 • 10^119)?
The coupling constant of the weak interactions of electron is only about 652 times smaller than the coupling constant of the electromagnetic interactions. The QED does not take it into account but gives good results. Is the QED incorrect? My new QED was completed in 2001.
We have many of various theories but we have not a homogeneous wordy description containing explanation of the basic physical terms such as the space-time (what is structure of the space-time?), mass, spin, charge, weak charge of neutrino, structure of photon (Einstein considered this problem), etc. There will not be a progress if we do not tie these things. Since the quarks had been introduced (41 years ago) we have not got any progress.
To explain the structure of gravitational field and the structure of weak charge of neutrino we need two particles smaller than the neutrino. These two particles are moving with velocities higher than the light velocity in vacuum and existence of the quantum theory and the Aspect's experiment prove it. These two particles I call the eterion and the higgson. In my theory the background of the infinite Universe is filled with eterions, higgsons and neutrinos. All objects larger than the neutrino are built of the neutrinos. There do not exist the gravitons and gravitational waves. This model gives possibility to explain all mysteries of the particles, nuclei, atoms and the Universe.
All theories connected with the elementary structures which have occurred since 1947-1948 (i.e. the theories based on the vibrating superstrings in the hyperspace, the quarks, the inflation, the perturbation theory with the renormalization, and the spinors with the 720o turns) are incorrect.
To describe the structure and behaviour of the neutrino we need, in the relativistic version, the 26 degrees of freedom. To describe the structure and behaviour of the higgson (i.e. the solid torus) we need, in the relativistic version, the 10 degrees of freedom, and of the eterion the 8 degrees of freedom. Such is the genesis of the Ramanujan modular functions applied in the superstring theory. There does not exist simpler version of the ultimate theory of the Universe but that presented in this book.
Regards
Sylwester Kornowski