Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eta C
Well, at first glance, it appears that Mr. Kornowski is convolving two recent experiemtns by Dr. Ketterle. First a bit of background, Ketterle shared the 2001 Nobel in physics for being one of the first to create a Bose Einstein Condensate (BEC). Bosons, (particles with integer spin) are not restricted by the Pauli exclusion principle (which applies to half-spin fermions such as electrons) and a large number of them, when sufficiently cooled, can all share the same quantum state.
Ketterle has continued to probe the properties of BEC's. One question is if they are superfluids like Helium-4. One piece of evidence for this would be if they could sustain quantized vortices as He-4 does. Ketterle did some work on this in 2000, as reported in this Physics Today article from August 2000. Using what they termed "optical spoons" they were able to "stir" a BEC in a magnetic trap and confirm the quantized vortex behavior.
What seems to have gotten Mr. Kornowski excited is an article from the 13 May 2005 issue of Physical Review Letters titled Formation Dynamics of a Fermion Pair Condensate. (Link is to abstract you need a subscription or pay to read the article). Pairs of fermions can link up to form a boson-like conglomerate. One example of this are electrons forming Cooper pairs in a superconductor.
I've printed out the paper and will report back on it shortly. However, on first glance I doubt the connection between it and Mr. Kornowski's idea. I'll do a more detailed critique later (the day job calls) but one question I would like him to answer is what mechanism or force binds two neutrinos (which are fermions) into a pair such as the one discussed in the paper. Also, Mr. Kornowski, it would be useful if you provided the references to the source documents as well as your own publications. |
In my book there is chapter titled ”Types of Interactions”. I can send you free e-copy of my book (PDF file). In my model the neutrino has the internal helicity and the weak charge (positive or negative-the Ketterle surface gives such possibilities). Interaction of two neutrinos of different states of the weak charge is dual to the electromagnetic interaction of the pair electron-positron, but there exist also other interactions: for example dual with the weak interaction of two nucleons or resulting from Bernoulli’s theorem.
The surfaces similar to the Ketterle surface it is only one element of the ultimate theory. Outside of the core of nucleon (built of the neutrinos) there is obligatory the Titius-Bode law and the ratio A/B is the same as for the solar system! The quarks do not exist because it is obvious that it is simpler to assume that inside nucleon there exist exchanges of elementary charge between the components of the nucleon than to believe in existence of quarks having the fractional charges-the result of experiment is the same!!!!
My theory was registered for example on August 10, 1989 in The Physical Review, number SG4107D, title: “The Titius-Bode law and structure of baryons”, on June 6, 1997 in The IJTP, numbers MS 970606 and MS 970606.1, titles “General Theory of Cosmological Singularities” and “Structure and Interactions of Particles”. My book “General Theory of Singularities” was published in 1998 by TAJGETA” ISBN 83-901005-8-4 and is attainable in the Jagiellonian University Library (also the next editions). Now my book is registered in The IJTP. Of course I was the first in formulating this theory.
A propos Wolfgang Pauli-it is some fragment of my book:
“In history of civilisation the ultimate theory seemed to be found many times...
but really present dream of the ultimate theory commenced in 1958 with Pauli and Heisenberg. On the radio interview Heisenberg said that they i.e. Pauli and himself were able to explain the masses of various elementary particles. That had terribly irritated Pauli who in his letter, published in the book Thirty Years That Shook Physics by Gamow, drew a blank square and put down the comment ”This is to show the world, that I can paint like Titian. Only technical details are missing.”. So the first picture of the ultimate theory was reduced to a blank square.”