View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 13-October-2005, 07:02 AM
Sylwester Kornowski Sylwester Kornowski is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
And, excuse my extreme ignorance, what has this got to do with astronomy?
My book it is 84 pages (size A4) and about 50% it is cosmology and about 50% it is particle physics and QED. It is obvious that the Cosmological Standard Model and the Inflationary Models are incorrect because on the beginning of the Big Bang there existed the superquasars and there was not time to form such structures from the tiny ripples. In my model our World hatched from structure built of neutrons which had surface analogical as the Ketterle surface. After the Big Collapse of this structure there was the Big Bang of our World. In my model the phenomena which take place in the nucleon also took place in the structure just before the Big Bang but density of energy was much much much higher. My theory for example describes the evolution of the Universe as a whole, there are chapters “Visible and dark matter, dark energy, and quasars. Why does the estimation of the age of our World contain error?” and “Cosmogony of the solar system and cosmology of the massive spiral galaxies”
I HAVE PROPOSAL FOR ADMINISTRATOR OF YOUR WEB. The coming discussion will be more essential if administrator throws my e-book open to the public. There is the descriptive part and my theory is very simple mathematically. We know that only theories simple mathematically are correct. Calculated the physical properties have great accuracy, for example the calculated mass of the proton is equal to 938.28MeV, the neutron 939.55MeV-the authors of the other theories may only to dream of it.