My original objection was that the 'future technology' supposedly described was in fact not so. However, this was based on a misunderstanding on my part of the dates involved. Hence my retraction on that specific objection.

The statements from the Hill's were apparently taken after hypnosis sessions in 1962 (this is enough for me to have alarm bells ringing already, but that is another argument for another day). I haven't seen transcripts of these hypnosis sessions, so I can't comment on how accurately these claims have been reported in the morass of abduction sites that pollute the web.

__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams