Quote:
|
Originally Posted by akirabakabaka
I would love to see this! Got a reference?
|
I read it just a day ago or so, have to check my internet cache and/or directory of downloaded documents.
Quote:
|
This argument has been all over these boards. I don't agree that you are not allowed to patch a theory to match observation, in fact it is often good science. But I agree that the BBT gets special treatment with regard to ad-hocery.
|
Yes, and the number of speculations which are made, are a bit too much.
At least it urges one to think, of this model of expansion, realy is the right track, and maybe there are other viable tracks.
Quote:
|
Has there been any research? Could you reference any of it?
|
I dunno at this time, I am myself new to WSM theory. I will look that up.
Quote:
Wikipedia on Wave Structure Matter
On the wiki: "The matter in all of the (accessible) UNIVERSE determines the properties of space, and reciprocally space determines the properties of matter."
Doesn't this just replace particle/wave duality with space/matter duality? There's a really interesting Einstein quote on the wiki about this.
|
I think it must read that the properties of matter are derived from the wave phenomena of space.
WSM implements the principe of Mach fully, that the properties of matter are derived from all other matter in the surrounding universe.