Moon Man, I've read such big-mouthed announcements from time to time. Until now, they all went pooooffff.
Why don't you give your argument now? Evasive manoeuvres from the beginning?
And when you ask a space shuttle to go to the moon, you show an appalling lack of technical knowledge.
Just because we don't any longer fly to the moon isn't evidence we never did. Can you book a supersonic passenger flight from N.Y. to London these days? No? Does this proves that the Concorde was a fake?
After Scott and Amundsen were at the south pole, nobody else went there for another 40 years.
Since the Trieste reached the ground of the Challenger Deep in 1960, no one ever returned to such depths.
You understand what I want to say?
Okay, show your "evidence". And don't evade after a few days with saying "The audience on this board is biased, I don't want to waste my time." I've seen this manoeuvre, too. Too often.
We are not biased. Except for the bias that in doubt we stick to facts and don't start to fantasize.
Of course, I'm a disinfo agent, too.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/kucharek.html
Who are you?