Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham2001
Thanks for providing the perfect introduction  .
This is going to be repetitive, but then it is increasingly becoming clearer that responding to 911 CT believers is like  |
agitation over substance
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham2001
As with most of the 'points' bought up by JG the witness statements he has linked to have been looked at by the webmaster of the 911Myths site . He has also looked into the 'pre-planted' explosives story, but rather than providing another link, I'll suggest that readers start exploring from the point I've linked to.
|
marvin bush sat on the board of diretors for securcom the companythat held the security contracts for the entire wtc complex as well as dulles airport--their 2yr contract for the wtc complex ended on 9/11/01--after which pointthe job was to be handed over to ex-fbi special agent jonh o'neil who had been forced off the investigation of bin laden by a presidential executive order W199I-WF-213589 signed by "w" who many believed he leaked and was killed his first day at his new job on 9/11/01
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham2001
This Coroners Report, deals with a 1997 'controlled implosion' that went badly wrong and as a result someone was killed. If nothing else, this gives some idea of the planning and engineering work that is supposed to go into such events. |
please
first you use agitation now your using diversion--both signs of an unwillingness to accept the facts presented before you