You have it backwards. Not only did Graham2001 link to something that has relevance to the topic, he even paraphrased his reason for doing so.

Even excluding the illogical motivations espoused by CTers for why this was done, this whole 9/11 nonsense does not add up. Maybe that's why people that peddle this hokum are content to try to lose these type of discussions in linked minutiae gleaned from CT woo sites that live for this stuff. I think the reason CTers concentrate on the collapse of the WTC is because those old stories about how the planes were remote-controlled was laughed right off the net .. so, if you need to make 9/11 "conspiratorial," what's left?

Pre-setting explosives and even a successful implosion are not impossible engineering feats. It's just that it's not mistake-proof and would be an ill-advised risk by the nefarious PTB. After all, we still had the planes crash into the towers. IMO CTers put too much stock in the collapse of the towers and overlook the reaction most of us in this country had prior to the collapse that morning. Remember this is the so-called cabal that couldn't even "produce" WMD in Iraq, yet we are told to believe that they managed to somehow pre-set explosives without anyone the wiser and pull off a demolition so perfect that most mainstream experts that investigated the site were/are fooled.