Wow, good research. Thanks. (Actually I didn't look that hard for Medved's piece, so thanks for covering for my laziness.) Turns out I'd already read it. I just didn't pay attention to who'd written it. I have a collection of reviews of the Fox program in my research file.

Medved is close enough to the target. The Fox program is poorly researched, sensationalist, and scientifically inept. Not much more can be said. Sibrel's rant now sounds like more of a complaint that he wasn't taken seriously enough.

Honestly, since only a little bit of research is required to debunk Sibrel, Medved couldn't have been Sibrel's intended audience. As near as I can tell, Sibrel is aiming for people who will simply nod their heads and do no original research or thinking on their own.