Thread: Bosnian Pyramid
View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-January-2006, 08:42 PM
Black Mamba Black Mamba is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
3000 years is a little more realistic, although why has Osmanagic ever mentioned these ridiculous 12000 and 27000 year estimates at all?
These links quote him as giving those dates
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com...s.php?id=53968
http://sciencepolitics.blogspot.com/...bosnia_07.html



Now it is certainly possible that someone has misquoted him, and mixed the dates up; then the Internet has picked up and repeated the mistake.
exactly exactly



Quote:
If this is an artificial mound it is considerably larger than the previous holder of the 'largest mound in Europe' title, Silbury Hill in Wiltshire.
http://www.stonepages.com/england/silburyhill.html
Silbury hill is 4000 years old, but only 130 feet high as opposed to 700 metres.
Today 08:03 PM

bosnian pyramid is not a mound, it is a stone building, there is a stone buidling uder the hill



Quote:
Hum,
yeah,
From the CBS article - "The hill was already there, some ancient civilization just shaped it and then coated it with this primitive concrete _ and there you have a pyramid."

Which would be quite possible during the Bronze Age onwards - as that was the time of wide spread hill fortification
this is not truth, osmangich said that it is not truth, someone has misquoted him

the truth is there is a stone construction under the hill
Reply With Quote