View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2006, 11:11 AM
RussT RussT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,577
Default

I fully understand, how much of this is “Intuited”, and how much of it is going to be next to impossible to “Prove”, however, because of “The Many” questions this model ‘appears’ to answer…

A” The original Hubble Expansion
Source Identified… SMBH from the universe level above our’s, spewing from a ‘White Hole’
Substance Identified…Dark Energy = Dark Gravity embedded in the Strings and Membranes of the 11 dimensions of “M” Theory.
I believe “M” Theory even says how small the Baryonic Matter that goes into the SMBH’s is “CRUSHED” ‘down to’ when it says how small the strings are.
Also, since the strings are embedded in the dark empty space, all the "Matter" that forms, simply forms with the strings embedded in it.
Very possibly Unifying QFT and GR.
According to Lee Smolin, the biggest problem that “M” Theory has, is that it is “Background Dependent”.

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/smol...n03_index.html

So, IMHO, showing how the Gravity is leaking into the strings from an “outside” source, and putting the ‘singularities’ “INSIDE” our universe ( VS “M” Theories current adherence to the ‘Singularity’ Making the whole universe), MAKES “M” THEORY “BACKGROUND INDEPENDENT” AND UNIFY’S QFT AND “M” THEORY!!!



B” Energy/Matter getting here a little at a time to slow the Hubble expansion
Getting here via ‘singularities’ that answer, How SMBH’s are created, and how the galaxies are born.
I believe ‘one’ of the best pieces of evidence I have for this is…”First Dark
Matter Galaxy Found”. This is exactly what would be seen after the “afterglow” of a GRB has ‘faded’ to darkness, and finally forms into the Hydrogen! (This took a “long” time in the Big Bang version), and also explains why there is no way to measure the
Baryonic Mass of a GRB afterglow!

http://www.spacetoday.net/Summary/2814
http://kencroswell.com/FirstDarkGalaxy.html

Another good piece of evidence is the “Baby” galaxies that GALEX has and is finding!

The “Best” piece of evidence though, is that for every 30 long GRB’s, there are 3 that will be 120 seconds or longer; Regular Galaxies with SMBH’s, and 27 that are 2 seconds
To 100 seconds; Dwarf Galaxies…the exact same ratio 10/1, for the Galaxies and the Dwarf Galaxies

Oh, by the way, I read somewhere, that GRB’s could not be the source for UHECR’s because they had at least 2 OOM less energy than needed, so, if GRB’s are what I’m saying they are, then they ‘could’ be the source of the UHECR’s.

C” The Accelerated Expansion
Source Identified…All the galaxies SMBH’s spewing out of a ‘White Hole’
Substance Identified…11 dimensional Dark Gravity (Dark Energy)

With this many pieces of the puzzle fitting, IMHO, so well, I “HAVE” to come to the opinion, that 9 years ago, when GRB’s were found to be at cosmological distances, there just might have been a “Rush To Acceptance”, on just exactly what those “BAD BOYS” are!!!

I also fully understand, that “IF” this is a fairly accurate picture of the universe, that ‘Singularities’ Make the Dark Stuff and Make the Galaxies, that ‘Singularities’ actually make the Entire Universe; this leaves science in a huge quandary! “IF” this is fairly accurate, and you just ‘toss it in the trash’, and don’t try to find a way to be able to accept ‘singularities’, even though we will probably never be able to get closer than 10^-43 seconds to them, then where does that leave us???

When I first came to BAUT, I was full of visions of grandeur, as I’m sure most with an ATM are, but I have come to realize, that nothing is going to happen quickly, no matter what, and proof of anything is going to be a long and arduous road! A road I really can’t even go down, because I have emphysema and only have probably 4 or 5 years and the last 2 won’t be pretty. I’m not on oxygen yet, but it won’t be long. (I am not on medication, so my mind is fine, can’t go there).
I also now realize, that understanding the universe and how it works is paramount, and that receiving any credit for coming up with this (if correct), is a very low priority. I guess we will just have to see if any or all of this is used without giving credit where credit would obviously be due.

RussT
www.icreateditfirst.com

The Universe 2 The Universe 2.doc 45,568 bytes Tue May 02 22:25:51 BST 2006
S=G
_______________
_____________________
Everything is, as it should be, otherwise, it wouldn't be!

Last edited by RussT; 04-May-2006 at 09:29 AM.